Looking back at Peter Rabbit

 

41scAgguyXL._SX374_BO1,204,203,200_

 

The ‘Tales of Peter Rabbit’ are a collection of short illustrated stories about a wild and farm animals who interact with each other natural enough to be real, but human enough to  be emotional.

For me the name alone reminds of the scene of a woman painting and then escaping the rain, to go home where she perhaps lives alone, where her pet rabbit Peter is waiting with her English tea. And as she paints the lightly water-color based art of the series comes in and her imagination comes to life.

The story had since its inception inspired or been enjoyed by thousands of children. I also grew up with a strange alienated attachment to those animals, especially the rabbits, but what makes the story  endearing and relevant? How does a show maintain its freshness, sensitivity and honest ambiance .

I feel like what makes the show good ( The original series) is that it was honest to the text, and for a kids story, it spoke about the well dressed danger that walks around the safe lines of life. There is intelligence and artistic beauty integrated so that the end product is almost paradoxical, to the point of enchanting an adult mind, while keeping the children entertained.

Even as an adult I still binge watch shows of this nature, that are typically targeted for children. I think what it does for mature minds is provide a vision into the space of beautiful chaos that once had in their lives, and they enjoy seeing a world that is full of evil and danger but has a clear compass that protects the good in its world. The lack of apparent complexity also helps makes the world more likable, for a while our fantasies of happy spaces can be real, or at least something to be seen.

I suppose the hyper-reality of the fictional is also something that eases the burden of truth for us as we see  danger that is not real. It more comfortable to feel and imagine because of the knowledge that it is fake.

But at the end of the day can the same claim be made for the minds and reception of children. Is beauty and movement enough for them, or is their understanding and demand of the balance between reality and magic the same as mature people, and they just don’t know how to fully express their feelings and feel more.

Either way I feel like Peter Rabbit is a treasure and a treat for its detail of animal like motion, human sentiment and British culture.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beatrix_Potter

 

 

 

 

Watch “BJ Saqid ( Author) Interview” on YouTube

So as I was walking around with my friend Mina, so sort of came across a book launch for a book about Imran Khan.

BJ Saqid was the author, and he seemed like a very nice man, and he was polite enough to answer all of our questions regarding his book and his beliefs about the subject.

He also mentioned that he will be working on more publications, and we can’t wait to see them.

Please follow my YouTube channel.

I’ll be posting there more often.

Heer Ranjha ( 1970) Review

 

I just really love this movie. It is a national treasure and everyone should watch it

 

1280x720-vGq

‘Heer Ranjha’, is a Pakistani film based on a poem by Waris Shah, ‘Heer’ who is the main character of this tragic love story. The poem is a homage and testament to the Punjabi language, landscape, culture and essence and it’s spell and impact is still with us today. In the poem we witness the spiritual growth of Heer, and how the pains of love enable her to grow and see life for what it is. Some scholars suggest that the poem and story is symbolic of a man’s search for Allah, which is common among Sufi writers and poets.

This review is not about the poem but about the 1970 film adaption of the tale, that like the story is an evergreen and enjoyable experience which is both entertaining and enlightening and is made,acted, directed and composed with sincerity and love for Punjabi culture.

 

heer

 

Review

 

The movie starts with a shot of the hero Ranjha playing his flute in the field, as two women pass by carrying water. Which is essentially the best depiction of a Punjabi village that is recognizable and the following scenes of happiness and playfulness were a good way to help  smoothen the movement of the story.

Ranjha is the youngest of the four brothers, and is spoiled and care-free because of which he  spends most of his time playing his flute and pulling pranks on his sister-in-laws, who have had it with him. They tease him one day and that becomes the push he needs to go out into the world and find the girl of his dreams. And then in a song we finally meet her, the beloved Heer.

I’m impressed by how the writers handled the scenes and writing because almost everyone has heard the story and know exactly what is going to happen in the end, and so seeing the two lovers happy at the beginning really brings out those tears when things go bad for them when they have to live without that same acceptance, protection and love from their families and each other.

It is a tragic tale but this movie really did well to add comedic elements which is why it is easy to watch it multiple times without having to cry too much. Both of the lovers are playful and have funny lines, the villains cause laughs despite being jerks, and I was crying tears of joy whenever Heer’s husband said something.

The acting gets full marks from me, all the actors knew what they were saying and the emotion in their voices and eyes was perfect so you really come to care for of them. Which is refreshing because in a lot of recent  adaptions the actors don’t even speak or understand Punjabi very well, and the narrative has turned the Punjabi language into a joke. So it’s just a breath of fresh air and sad realization that in the past we could have actors who knew what they were saying and respected the writing and did their job.

 

HeerRanjha

 

The music was epic, the credits actually start with Noor Jahan singing the poem, and her voice is perfect for the role. The soundtrack over all fits the feeling and the atmosphere very well, and it’s very wholesome with an amazing band of singers, but Noor Jahan’s songs really are the best ones, or at least the most iconic from the film. Especially the Wangli( Flute)  song.

But even with being a fun watch with lovely music, attractive actors and a general happy tone, the movie still does the philosophy of Waris Shah justice, and the poetic dialogue hits you hard. The same can be said about the character development and the love story which is a big statement of the evolution of the human spirit, the power of love, standing up to power and fighting for what you believe in. And it’s sad because they get so close just to fail.

If I had to pick out some not great aspects about the film, I guess it’s a little old so the print isn’t that high is definition and there are songs scenes and songs were weren’t that necessary like the whole thing about Heer’s sister-in-law. But overall I don’t really have many complaints. The acting, singing and writing was good, and the overall feeling you get from watching the movie is fun and happy. Waris Shah was ahead of his time, and we should applaud his genius.

N-vZS

 

 

It might not appeal modern movie watchers who need seven to twelve item songs, a car chase, out-of-order physics or forced jokes with a laughing track that only makes it worse.

‘Heer Ranjha’ is essentially the standard for good Pakistani and Desi cinema.

I should be handed down to a whole new generation so they can connect with their culture and history and learn from the philosophy and life of our great saints and writers.

And there are plenty  adaptions of the tale, but I would say that this is a best one.

So yeah, watch it with the family and maybe introduce your kids to it and tell them the story, because we need to preserve and protect our culture.

 

To watch the movie :

 

To listen to the original poem:

 

 

To learn more about Waris Shah and his literature:

http://tns.thenews.com.pk/250-years-heer-waris-shah/#.WuSFtu8vxdg

Mausoleum of Waris Shah

https://nation.com.pk/10-Sep-2016/waris-shah-urs-from-23rd

http://www.hamariweb.com/poetries/waris-shah_poetries97.aspx

Lok Virsa to launch book on Waris Shah

 

Emily Dickinson’s relationship with Death

Hi everyone

This is my essay for my American poetry class. I got good reviews on it, and I think I did a good job, but I really want to improve my writing and analytical skills. So if you have any expertise, suggestions or remarks, be generous.

 

Emily-Dickinson-1

 

 

Emily Dickinson had a rather interesting relationship with death itself, and she acknowledged this throughout her life, that she was haunted by the ‘menace of death’.Her poetry has several accounts of her experiencing funerals and death takes on different forms and faces to communicate with her. This alludes to the establishment of a bond of finding solace and companionship with death.

One might suggest that it was the aversion she felt towards the futile existence of real life, that led her to crave death. For, she did make a constant effort to not experience a full life, or lead an existence like the others around her. She spent her life rarely leaving her room, communicating through closed doors, and she didn’t even her own fathers funeral down stairs. She never married, and only wore white. She lived not living a life of the common woman of that time.

She was indeed a prolific writer who expressed herself unlike anyone else in poetry, but even  her poems were a well-kept secret, discovered after her death by her sister. It is also important knowing that her room had a clear vision of a graveyard – and that her family had taken work as caretakers for funerals.

By this outline, one can easily see why the interest in death would develop, as it was all around her.

But death is not ugly,sad, terrifying or distasteful for her. in her narrations and poems, Dickinson is someone who is not a stranger to the face of death and death is often personified as someone she interacts with. She also experiences in full vision her own funeral without a peep of fear, regret or unease and even her descriptions of death are not filled with typical colors of black, purple , green or images of grit but all images come with easy emotions.

One may analyse that because her life was absent of catalysts that engaged her interest. She found activity  and stimulation in these thoughts of dying.

“Because I could not stop for death

He kindly stopped for me “

Death with its many faces is sometimes a friendly companion, a devil-like fly and also a lover. This could be an indication to the repressed feelings within her, as she could not physically digest the reality of those commitments in real life, she decided to have them in her imagination.

It is interesting for death to be her lover, because according to the psychoanalytical theory the desire not to die and to reproduce are what form a persons basic moving factors in all humans, but there is obviously an inversion of this concept  here. She is attached to the desire of dying and in it finds the place to create life. Maybe her poems are one of those creations of her love for death.

There is obviously no denial of death in her poems, as she bluntly mentions it. What one might suggest is that the constant occurrence of death might be an act of ‘sublimation’. Sublimation is a defense mechanism in which bad memories and feelings are  made uplifting and beautiful in order to ease the pain of those memories.  So her ordeal with death in her poetry is a way of dealing with the death of loved ones – a kind of therapy to ride her heart and mind of trauma.

“I could not see to see”

Compared with writers on the same topic, the death of women, or death in general her poems are very sensual, active and through the vivid and watching eyes of the dying soul.

Edgar Allen Poe would often write about the death of his wife, and in his poems, would mention her death body, which in a way objectified her. And the tragedy in his poems does not follow the death of his wife, but follows his loss and depression of the loss of her to him, and everything that he felt and saw.

“For the moon never beams, without bringing me dreams
   Of the beautiful Annabel Lee;
And the stars never rise, but I feel the bright eyes
   Of the beautiful Annabel Lee;
And so, all the night-tide, I lie down by the side
   Of my darling—my darling—my life and my bride,
   In her sepulchre there by the sea—
   In her tomb by the sounding sea.”

And if one sees that through the waiting days of John Keats, one finds a sad man, waiting like a caged animal to meet death as something that he knows is coming, and there is no hope for him. So for Keats there is often that denial or exclusion of the body of death, and a focus on the beauty of what is felt, and an obsession of wanting to freeze time and be immortal through poetry and art.

“Why did I laugh tonight? No voice will tell:

No god, no demon of severe response,

Deigns to reply from heaven or from hell.

Then to my human heart I turn at once-

Heart! thou and I are here sad and alone;

Say, wherefore did I laugh? O mortal pain!”

 

All of which is not there in Emily Dickinson’s words, who is comfortable and at ease with the grim reaper. Her ‘voyeurism’ transcends the simple plot of dying, that one might say that because she an intellectual ahead of her time, she knew her thoughts would not be accepted in her polite, puritanical society.  She therefore exiled herself for her own safety.

And this becomes apparent in her poems ‘ I heard a fly buzz’, in which she is aware of the eyes watching her and how a small fly has blocked her vision. The fly is a symbol for the devil, because the people around her would believe she belonged to  hell. The devil is often called the lord of the flies and this fly denies her clear vision.

Vision, was something of great importance to her. The eyes  were a mirroring symbol for people, death is never watching her, death is becoming to her. In death she found her muse, lover,friend, foe and a canvas to express herself and everything inside her mind.

 

Further reading.

https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poets/emily-dickinson

https://www.learner.org/catalog/extras/vvspot/Dickinson.html

 

Graveyard Poem

This is a poem after a long time. About my grandfathers.

 

 

A long time ago
A traveller built his hut
Outside the town park
Where two boys played
This was after the king was poisoned 
And the Queen sent to the nunnery
And the children sent close away
These boys didn’t leave
And maybe they never met each other
But ran through the same grass
They rose to their charms and beauty
And left for war
And left for the forests
Within track struck trains
And in the curves of lost thoughts
Their children inherited
Languages now lost
Stories still echoed
Both young…troubled
Amazed and in tears
That God fed them
As if they were –
And now just a few steps aside
They lay deep in eternal sleep
With the graves almost lost
Where nobody came
Where everyone forgot
Then why do I
Blushed like the petals
Cry

 

diya

In the play , the chorus repeatedly gives us moral lessons , often condemning pride , are we to take the proclamations of the chorus as the absolute truth , or is the chorus just as fallible As other characters ? Is pride really the catalyst for all the catastrophes of the play ? ( Oedipus Rex)

One of the really old ones, I actually put some effort into this one.

 

 

oedipusrex_2100x1400_03

 

 

The  Chorus does indeed give the audience many moral lessons according to that time and society .Acting as fourth wall of dialogue and even a dramatic enhancement to the already emotional and moral questioning play .Arguably pride is a major  factor which propels the action sequence and complexity of the play , but there are also key aspects that may control the events like fate or the will of the gods .It is among all of these reasons that audiences struggle with the sight of the fall of Oedipus from glorious king to a homeless, friendless and blind nomad  .

To understand fully the depth of the role and opinion of the chorus , concerning morality . Along with   the influence of the sin – pride on the characters and plot.  We will first go through a small introduction of   “Chorus” in the setting of a Greek play – later analyzing the objectionable actions or statements of characters like Oedipus and Jocasta.

As is the case with many other Greek plays , the chorus in Oedipus Rex is the voice of the society and traditions of ancient Greece . Their odes are filled with religious knowledge and submission towards the gods and the kings . They also provide a deeper , more philosophical journey into the themes of the play . In many plays the chorus had a role of action , or an ability to influence the action of the plot – but that is not in the case of Oedipus .  Here they dryly preach morals and pass judgments while invoking the help and curse of the gods . A curse initially on the one who brought forth the plague but by the end they to lose the moralistic , unforgiving tone , adopting sympathy and lost love for the damned king .

Of course the chorus has other roles to play . Sophocles himself , raised the importance of the chorus and even added more actors – they magnify the significance of the tragic nature of his play and give little relief from the already apparent doom .

Daniels and Scully the authors of “what is really  going on in Sophocles Theban plays “ wrote that .

 

“No feature of Greek tragedy is more intractable than the chorus “

 

(What is really  going on in Sophocles Theban plays)

 

The two basic moral lessons that the chorus does insist on giving the audience ,directly through speech, are obedience to the gods and loyalty towards their ruler . Both are the rules of the society , but this behavior is in contrast with the attitude of the nobility . They are humble and lack both the responsibility and hubris of the rulers to look towards to cure the disease that harms the land .

In the first ode they make a long prayer to the gods asking for a remedy and laying themselves at complete mercy . Acknowledging the full power or authority of oracles , which Oedipus and Jocasta do not . This may be deliberate to teach the masses a lesson about not angering the gods . To follow their commands , because the nobility cannot escape their wrath no matter how much they try .

Strangely at the beginning of the play while at the alter , they look towards Oedipus as a god himself . As he is the only one that can safe them – all responsibly is on his shoulders and like a good king he treats them like his children – with a sense of pride and defiance towards the gods .

 

“Come then my children : Leave the alter steps “

_ Oedpius Rex

 

It is after this order by Oedipus that the chorus enters with their  song and praise the powers of the gods . They call out their names , doing so giving a break for the action of the play and reminding the audience of authority .

 

“Let me pray to Athene , the immortal daughter of Zeus . And to Artemis her sister ..And to Apollo , bowman at the far butts of heaven “

_ – Oedipus rex , Parodus .

 

This does indeed show the religious ,pious side of the chorus of the play but one must remember . The gods do not make an appearance in the play , the closet to them are the oracles and the priests who do little to stop disaster . Oedipus In all glory and heavy headedness still makes more efforts of changing his troubled destiny then other characters. The plague came far long after the sin was committed, he was able to be default save the riddle and bring peace to land . It is a quality among leaders to be unapologetic of the decisions they make and  try by all means to reach the goal . The chorus and other characters barely try to alter what can be altered .Oedipus points out this flaw , even if he is blind to his own . The flaw,  that they could properly manage their own affairs. Waiting  till the brink of destruction to clear matters.

 

It is then in the second ode of the play , that the chorus again adopts a highly moralistic vocabulary , quite literally . They name social and personal sins , ironically the ones Oedipus possesses .

 

“The tyrant is a child of pride

Who drinks from his great sickening cup

Recklessness and vanity “

  • Oedipus Rex

 

Kings and princes have throughout history have been known more for their luxury and vanity than piety. The protagonist of the play is no exception, but can he really be blamed? When he calls for the blind prophet and insults him, in turn disrespecting the gods   the prophet returns the curse. This may also show his show of haughtiness. The prophet does not remain calm , just like Oedipus he becomes angry and agitated and relies on curses .  One common explanation of why Oedipus might have killed Lias in the forest is his royal upbringing. A prince would not be held highly accountable for the death of common people . The Thebans place him on a pedestal and treat him like a god – so obliviously he is going to think of himself as important and untouchable. It is evident in the way he talks about himself

 

“But I am a child of luck I cannot be dishonored”

  • Oedipus Rex

 

To conclude this part of the question , yes , the chorus provides moral lessons but they are not free of weakness or wrong doing . The chorus undergoes a change in character along side Oedipus , by the end of the play their last song becomes pessimistic and is unable to think of fate as justice . They remain loyal to Oedipus , the most royal one .

 

Now , towards the discussion of Pride as a catalyst for all the catastrophes in the play. For this may have to go the background of the play, to when the oracle first warned Jocasta and Lias about the terrible destiny of the child . It is not known if consulting oracles is a sin or not since it was common at the time . It is however as act of pride to defy an oracle , and this is done multiple throughout Oedipus Rex . The fact that mortals thinks that they can change or control the fate which the gods decide , is and act of blasphemy . It is pride and sin when Lias and Jocasta send the child to be killed in the plains , an act common of the Spartans . A Greek nation that let fate decide which children were to live and which were to die . It Is fear and pride that makes Oedipus run away from his new home after he learn of his destiny . He acts as god when he decides to run away , even if his intentions were innocent .

This is also his tragic flaw , the quality which makes him a hero in the eyes of the audience . He tries with all his might to prevent a curse but is unable to. His heart and efforts were in the right place . It could have been fear and not pride which motivated all the events prior to the scenes in the play .

The next display of his flaw is when he murders his real father on the road . This may have been due a sudden burst of anger or princely disposition but even at that time Oedipus was right . Lias had pushed his luck and perhaps something snapped inside of Oedipus . The very hand of fate perhaps took hold of him . Either way he let his ego get the better of his actions and judgment.

Oedipus has another flaw – a lack of insight. It was by strange chance that he solved the riddle of the sphinx and became king . Even the blind prophet tells him that his own eyes betray him , that is unable to see his true self . Jocasta insists that tempers like his only torment, as he is unable to let things go . All the things he holds onto destroy him In the end .

When observing the events that take place in the play , it is evident that pride does play a major role to get events moving in flow with the suspense of the plot .

It is pride that motivates Oedipus to look for a solution to the plague , that brings him to dishonor oracles and the blind prophet .

 

“You are a sightless , witless ,senseless , mad old man”

  • Oedipus Rex

 

Pride and agitation still  brings him to argue with his brother in law . It can also be denial underneath all his anger. He wants the matter to die .

It is the same with Jocasta , she gives no importance to oracles or prophecies . It is only when things become clear to her that she begins to break down and ultimately takes her own life .

 

“All right forget about those things you’ve said

Listen to me and ease your mind with this – no human being has skill in prophecy “

 

Perhaps it is pride that brought her to suicide. Then again humans are capable of feeling more than just pride , maybe it was the immense shock . The horror and the shame that may have overrun her mind and senses .

It is thought by many that the action of taking his eyes out by Oedipus is again nothing more but a show or result of pride again .He does not have any strength anymore , he cannot witness the torment he tried for so long to run away from . Of course it may also be an act of self harm and sacrifice – he no loner runs away . He does not try to escape his horrible fate anymore now that the ultimate damage is done . He does however make plans of protection for his children.

With this is mind it is apparent that pride is indeed a major catalyst – but far long before Oedipus was born there was  a curse on the family . Was it destiny from the very first day , mere chance that pushed everything .it was  Human compassion that saved Oedipus once when he was left to die an infant . It was human love and loneliness that made him a prince again . It was human folly , a drunk man who caused him to search for an oracle – at the end it was the will of the gods that won the toll on his life .

The plagues itself that eats Thebes came when the gods decided to remember the curse . After all those years of peace , it is the plague which opens and inquiry into all that is suppressed . Almost like a journey into the depths of the mind in search of a tangled truth .

However , we cannot decide fully what factors brought out the disaster . It is perhaps a mixture of both fate and human action . In “The kiss of the snow Queen “ the writer gives the example of a girl Greda who travels to the far ends of the south pole to save her friend kai from the snow queen . The queen is the personification of winter and the forces of nature . She in a way seduces the boy and takes him way . Greda who is innocent and personifies spring  makes a journey and effort to save her love . So it is God who saves people but only through the struggle of pure hearted individuals does salvation come .

Much like the sacrifice Jesus Christ had to make to save humanity. It is Greda’s kiss and love that saves the boy from freezing to death while solving a mathematical problem . A triumph of human compassion over human reason – Oedipus sadly has no one to make the effort for him. Jocasta leaves him alone and he cannot even return to the love of his step mother .

This failure of love is the true element that brings out the pessimistic tone in the end of the play . The reminder that man is alone and at the mercy of his fate .

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

An analysis of ‘Valediction’ by Seamus Heaney

Another old assignment

kki

Lady with the frilled blouse
And simple tartan skirt,
Since you have left the house
Its emptiness has hurt
All thought
In your presence
Time rode easy, anchored
On a smile
but absence
Rocked love’s balance, unmoored
The days.
 They buck and bound
Across the calendar

Pitched from the quiet sound
Of your flower-tender
Voice. Need breaks on my strand;
You’ve gone, I am at sea.
Until you resume command
Self is in mutiny.

 

 

 

The poem ‘Valediction’ by the Nobel prize winning poet is about the feelings of the writer, for a woman who is either deceased or gone for sometime on a cruise, and it explores the feelings and thoughts of a man struck with pain and awaiting her return. It is a rather short love poem, with simple a stance and narrative, which makes the message clear and easy to understand, and this very style makes the poem honest.

The poem begins with a descriptive statement of ‘ Lady with the frilled blouse’, which leaves the mysterious woman with an image, but no name, so it almost as if he is recalling her by trace of memory, as if he has begun to forget her personality or traits already due to the separation. She is also wearing a ‘Tartan skirt’, which gives a the poem a sense of nationality and nationalism, which is something Heaney believed in greatly, and wrote widely about, so this lady love of his who has no name thus far is someone who personifies his love for his culture.

He continues to write that her absence has him deep and that his thoughts have been disfigured ever since, which adds an essence of a mourning lover to the narration. By this point we do not know if either his lover has left for a voyage, or if she has passed away, but whatever the cause, the poet is deeply moved and struck imbalanced by the separation. We can see his dependence and need for her, that is so necessary that even his health is beginning to diminish. And thus far there is still no grand information about her, and only a slight detail of how the poet feels now that she is gone. So this short, sweet and honest love poem is somber and melancholic almost, as it deals with the nostalgic thoughts about a lost lover. A lost love, that maybe a woman, the past and time itself, one’s own youth, or a dream that never took place.

In the following lines, the poet recalls her smiles and he uses certain words that are generally associated with sailing, boats and the sea, like ‘rocked’, ‘anchored’ and ‘rode’. By doing so he adds a sense of stability to the poem, and the poems continues to dwell in nostalgia, and it metaphorically talks about how the poet felt secure, in the presence of this woman. She was someone who sailed through life with him, and without her he feels weak or defeated.

“But absence – rocked loves balance”

So this particular love poem, which is brief, focuses entirely on one person and one feeling or time, in the relationship. His love either does not need to be grandly gestured by him stating that he loved her, like the case with many sonnets, which are intended to be read by someone.  This is a very emotionally secure poem, but it feels very personal, as if there is nothing to say to the lover, but only to make the man feel better by talking about his woes.

Then suddenly the poem picks up an abrupt speed, reflecting the urgency in the poet’s heart, ‘You’ve gone- I am at sea’. The poets is distressed due to the absence, making his love grow stronger, within the endless mist of the sea, yet it is strange that he is the one at sea but he says that the lady has left. Perhaps there was a fight or something which caused a separation, and it is only now that the poet finally realizes how deep and unshaken his love is. It a symbolic revelation because he is at sea, which is a strong feminine symbol, often linked to women and the female psyche. Maybe that is why he feels so strongly about her memory, the sea has given him time to ponder and think about his life, and all he seems to remember is a woman who brought some love stability into his life.

H clearly wants her to return in his life, so he may feel the same way, allowing peace to come back to him. He writes that he wants her to take command, which is rather strange, even for a love since they mostly express mutual love through the male gaze, and unlike the convention of the man fighting or proving his love for his lady, in order to win her he is actually giving himself up to her. Which implies a level of trust and understanding between the two, that they both know that they love each other.

The ending line also assures the reader the poet is his own individual, he may be in awe or woe of his love, but he has a strong sense and awareness of being his own person. He does not blame anyone of love for his internal conflict, but is aware that resuming his hearts love, he may be saved from his own ‘mutiny’.

‘Cider’, on the trip to Kasur,Eid, getting work and coming into ones own.

kasur

 

 

Hi world, I hope you have been well and that you had an amazing Eid with your family and loved ones. I had a pretty good time myself, and I got to do a lot  against the grain in these last two days. And I guess we are going to talk about that for this blog post at least.

On the first day of Eid, I got up a little late, and spent sometime with the family, and out of the blue, we actually decided to make a random trip to the near-by city of Kasur, which is approximately an hours drive outside of Lahore. I am surprised we actually did drive out, because everyone is normally busy and or tired from work and school. I had been begging for a long time to actually get out more, and enjoy life you are young, at least in my case. Any way we got in the car, and enjoyed the lovely ride towards Kasur.

ss23

 

Our destination was the shrine of Baba Bullesh Shah, who is a poet, saint and figure of great prestige for the Punjabi language. So if Urdu has Ghalib, Punjabi has Bulleh Shah.He is a writer who has for seven hundred years enchanted readers and inspired the heart of singers. There is something universal in him, that resonates to  people regardless of age and time, my parents ave always loved him. So a good way to bond is clearly to explore topics that people love mutually and can grow with. I wanted to go for those reasons and other, I wanted to see things,people, buildings and understand how time can stand still and move in union. I wanted to vlog the event also, and I did so also, but I believe it could have been better. But I did enjoy the trip, and from what my folks said, it turned out to be a trip that they needed for themselves.

So if you ever get the chance do go… you’ll drive into a pristine,historical and clean little town, that has seen a lot of hard times, but unlike bigger cities has remembered their history and always respected it. You’ll be able see the graves of several historical figures, and have a good go on local food. Kasur is famous for Andrassa ( kind of biscuit) and Falooda ( sweet dish).

Since it was Eid, the day I went I want to talk about something the animals we slaughter. I know we normally just pack the meat up and give it around our own neighborhoods, who already are being stacked with meat from the other neighbors. Fact is we do not really need all of this meat, what we should be doing is giving it to poor people. The greater Pakistani population does not have access to meat because they cannot afford it, and because of that they are not growing properly. So we should try to focus our actions in a more productive way, that helps the people around us.

rajput-bride-ER73_l

Moving on I’ve been getting a lot of writing things, and that makes me happy and I hope they keep in coming and that I could improve my skills and add to the culture. But for some strange reason, no matter how much I want to improve I end up almost sabotaging my chances and half-assing my way through life, despite actually wanting to do my absolute best. It’s not just with my writing work, but with my studies as well.

That is bad… I need to fix myself …. must improve.

Lastly, just to expand on the last point, It is important for us to look deep into ourselves and tell ourselves what exactly we want in life.We must do so, if are ever to achieve anything.

‘Laputa: Castle in the Sky’ (1986) Review

Hey world, I haven’t done a movie review in a while, so here it is. I will probably do a lot of that when the magazine comes out. With that I’ll learn to write more professional movie reviews but for now let’s keep it friendly.

For this review we will be talking about a classic,Japanese favorite of mine,Castle in the Sky.

 

MXUuBhG

‘Castle in the Sky’ is a movie directed and written by Hayao Miyazaki, who is one of the most respected and famous animators to come out of Japan. And with good reason to, because his work is beautiful, heart-felt, nostalgic, conscious of the environment and  breathtakingly inspiring.

castle gif 2

In this film we are taken to strange fictional world, where the period is both old and new and air ships are used. The conflict in the first scene  captures our attention really fast so we are curious and in suspense as to why all this trouble over a girl with a necklace. As the lovely music based soundtrack carries us away from time and allows to dwell deeper as this mysterious little girl falls from the sky and begins to float.

I would say that the entire was very well-balanced and that the characters were all unique and likable and easy to enjoy and have feelings for, plus the grand scale of the art style was always pleasing. There was a pretty amount of blue and green landscapes, and the architecture again provided a nice emptiness which added on the feeling of nostalgia. Plus the pacing was perfect, there were slow heartfelt  moments where the characters got to bond well, but I feel like every scene was like real life because it was linked and had a bit of all the emotions people go through. Like even in the slightly romantic scenes there is an element of fear, a sensation of courage and adventure, an addition of visual comedy in the company of expressive dialogues.

robot

 

So I loved the movie, as you can tell, and I have loved it ever since I was a little child. It is one of those movies that you want to watch to feel how time has passed you by, and also it is a movie that grows in meaning everything you watch. The message is different when you watch is as an adult compared to how it was an epic adventure when you were a kid.

The plot basically consists of two kids who are thrust into this search for an abandoned and almost forgotten city that floats in the sky. But also in this pursuit is the army and a family of pirates. And in the process the characters come face to face with their fears, and grow as they get closer to the city.

castle gif 3

 

Thematically the movie talks about love, dreams, peace and power and the fate of mankind.

 

castle gif

Love of any kind because we get to watch are two adorable protagonists, Sheeta and Pazu, become closer and save each other. Relationships and expressions of love are handled in a unique way in Miyazaki’s films. There are no abrupt confessions, or flashy songs, or obvious reasons or even set gender roles when it comes to a growing relationship or understanding. I like that they are able to communicate with each other fully and that they take care of each other, where as in most other movies the biggest cause of a problem is the lack of common ground between the lovers, or lack of communication.

Miyazaki even said so himself in an interview.

“I’ve become skeptical of the unwritten rule that just because a boy and girl appear in the same feature, a romance must ensue. Rather, I want to portray a slightly different relationship, one where the two mutually inspire each other to live – if I’m able to, then perhaps I’ll be closer to portraying a true expression of love.”
― Hayao Miyazaki

The other kind of love in the movie is spiritual love or the love for nature, and making peace with the earth and its ways. Sheeta says this as Muska points a gun at her.

“The world cannot live without love”

castle gif 4

Castle in the Sky may be an innocent movie  and it does not have anything vulgar in it, but there is a very good and reflective portrayal of the evil in the hearts of men, and how those forces of greed and selfishness can lead to the destruction of mankind. Which speaks a lot about on the current situation the earth is in now. Even if people don’t believe in global warming, they can see the change when Lahore has lost most of it’s for trees to urban construction. They can see how the tigers are being killed in India, and sense the heat or the sting in the air. And most of this is our own fault, but all these big corporations just want what benefits them with no concern of the land.

lappy

 

But nature eventually does win. We get to see that when the kids land straight in Laputa. They are met with a rusty robot, who is all alone and takes care of the animals and plants in the city. This was one of favorite scenes, because of the art and the message those movie stills leave behind. Laputa as we are told really was a great power of legend, and there in the clips it is empty and at peace like the ruins of any other civilization we have here among us. Even in its death it is alive, but the feeling is bittersweet, it’s like looking at those pictures of the ruins of Egypt. Which was once a great power in Africa, and it was also looted time and time again by Europeans, and been robbed of something.

Which leaves one to believe it is truly best to leave these cities and buildings as they are, and protect them.    The city floats away in the movie, and the only thing that is ever left of any nation is their children. An old house is never really used as a house ever again.

But even so there needs to be an appreciation of the past and a personal bond should be developed with nature if we are to survive. Castle in the Sky just reminds us of that. It is all this and a lot more.

castle_2

And again the amazing art work deserves a class award of its own, because it brings the entire concept to life. And the soundtrack doesn’t need any words to justify it.

So I would recommend everyone to watch it. Watch with your family and your kids, and be swept away on an amazing journey and yeah be inspired.

 

 

Sheep Don’t 


Suppose you could 

Take the world for granted 

That you could have whatever you wanted 

Take whatever they stole 

Steal whatever you wanted 

The oyster and the North star that isn’t real 

If you could would you save the world or tear it down to ashes and ashes 

It’s weird that work hard just to have it shot down by destiny 

That we control our life when God owns  it 

We are who we are until we change 

We are who we are until we get rich 

Then we are what we are 

The final stage 

The first page 

Laugh while you can 

Don’t take the world seriously 

People work so hard to find a good leader and make them pass through tests and lies and controls 

And they still end up with a tyrant 

Tyrants know what they are 

Sheep don’t